Reflecting on a moment in the artist’s thinking
By Sherman Mern Tat Sam

Introducing our ‘Excerpts’ series! Over the years, we have republished parts of long-form writing, from catalogue essays to book chapters. This practice will now be formalised in a monthly column. We will continue to be on the lookout for content to share. If you may like to send us texts to consider, please email info@artandmarket.net.

Ian Woo, ‘Finger food’, 1998, acrylic on canvas, 76.5 x 101.7 x 3.2cm. Image courtesy of the artist and FOST Gallery.

“Philosophy just puts everything before us, and neither explains nor deduces anything. – Since everything lies open to view there is nothing to explain.”¹

Wittgenstein (PI 126)

I

When I visited Ian Woo last year he showed me some recently rediscovered old paintings. This exhibition is a result of that piece of serendipity. Although the selected works cover a five-year period, 1997–2001, it is ‘Finger food’, completed in 1998, that triggered this conversation. Woo refers to the group of works around ‘Finger food’ as “tabletop paintings”. It’s a phrase that playfully describes the view of his forms, which is looking down as if gazing upon a table, but also plays with a Singaporean’s main cultural preoccupations: food and eating. The flat, planar fields of colour in ‘Finger food’, like the others from this time, provide the ground for more painterly touches to evoke form. Across these green-grey-cream paintings there is a sense that forms, articulated by gestures, are in a state of becoming. Does that shape at the top right of ‘Finger food’, with its greyish vertical band and conical end, suggest a piece of sushi? Or even a fish head? Could there be a Guston-like grey toothbrush balancing on a bar of white soap in the lower left corner of ‘Knees and toes’ (1998)? Yet despite these multitudinous shapes and touches, collectively these paintings exude a calm ease.

Ian Woo, ‘1998’, 2023, exhibition view at FOST Gallery, Singapore. Photography by Wong Jing Wei. Image courtesy of the artist and FOST Gallery.

It would be easy to drive towards metaphors of consumption and materialism, or even comparisons of paint’s sensuality to palates and tastes in the interpretation of these works. But in the end Woo’s forms are suggestions rather than specific representations. It is as if he were slowly sorting through his mind and laying out the different items and categories. “The first time I was using so many things in my paintings,” he said, “was when I first came back to Singapore from England in ’97. I guess I was trying to find the language of living here. Singapore is a very strange country, I grew up here, in a mix of Chinese and Western culture, a lot of American T.V., Western movies and Hong Kong serials.”² The implication is that in a young amalgamated culture, one that is importing diverse influences, there is a need to unpack things and digest ideas.

It is as if Woo were trying to force us to recreate the experience of seeing without the object of vision. This is an experience that recurs in different ways throughout Woo’s oeuvre. The philosopher of phenomenology Edmund Husserl describes perception as “a process of streaming from phase to phase; in its own way each of the phases is a perception, but these phases are continuously harmonised in the unity of a synthesis..”³ Husserl is, of course, speaking about observing the world. But painting slows vision, it allows us to perceive parts and wholes, in fact it can help us to hold off the process of synthesis.

Ian Woo, ‘Painting and the art of moving air 2’, 2000, acrylic on linen, 116 x 87 x 5cm. Image courtesy of the artist and FOST Gallery.

II

Instead of ‘1998’, another title for this show might have been the moods (or passions) of Ian Woo. The exhibition is loosely grouped in two parts: cooler, interiorised pieces like ‘Finger food’ and more gestural or dynamic works like ‘Painting and the art of moving air 2’ (2000). This dichotomy foreshadows the differential that Woo utilizes in the future: hot and cool, dynamic and calm, intellectual and material. Collectively both these groups fall into the period between his MA in Barcelona (1995) and his Australian doctorate (2006). His Barcelona paintings play with wispy, whispery gestures on flattish, moody grounds. We can perhaps attribute that to his interest at the time in Chinese ink painting and Western monochromes, in particular those of Gerhard Richter; that is, drawing on different visual languages.

‘Painting and the art of moving air 2’ is a smorgasbord of painted moments: small vernacular touches, big modernist brushstrokes; a postmodern inset, Turner-like atmospheric passages that dissolve into lush paint. For instance, a dark rectangle, top right, hints at modernist geometry, yet the orange slash across it exudes an atmospheric charge, like a crack of sunshine on a storm-dark sky. The painting moves between zones of atmospheric intensity and smooth calmness, combining a traditional painter’s vernacular (e.g. stippling) with a modernist’s grandeur (brash gestures). While just below are four colour-charged strokes resembling stripes over which stippled paint could be some form of exploded cake. “I use a variety of styles in painting. Living in this time,” Woo said, speaking at the end of the twentieth century, “I find it difficult to use one style to paint, because the history of painting is so rich. The history and language of painting is so varied and available, so I just edit and find a way of putting them together.”⁴

This is an excerpt of Sherman Mern Tat Sam’s essay, published on the occasion of Ian Woo’s solo exhibition ‘1998’. The show is on view from 20 May to 22 July 2022 at FOST Gallery, Singapore.

To read other writings from the Excerpts series, click here.

¹Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 126, p.50. (London, 1986).
²Ian Woo, “Ian Woo and Painting”, in Mental Images: Paintings and Drawings, interview with Binghui Huangfu, p.24. (Singapore, 2000).
³Edmund Husserl, Analyses concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures of Transcendental Logic, p.107. (The Netherlands, 2001).
⁴Ian Woo, “Ian Woo and Painting”, in Mental Images: Paintings and Drawings, interview with Binghui Huangfu, p.27. (Singapore, 2000).

About the Writer

Sherman Mern Tat Sam is an artist and critic based in London and Singapore. He has exhibited internationally, including one-person shows at The Suburban (Chicago), the Rubicon Gallery (Dublin), Equator Art Projects (Singapore), Annka Kultys Gallery (London), and CeyssonBenetiere (Luxenbourg). His work has also been included in numerous group exhibitions, including M6: Around London at CCA Andratx (Majorca), Connected at Feature Inc (New York), The Theory and Practice of Small Paintings at Equator Art Projects (Singapore), Slow Painting, a UK touring museum exhibition, and Strange Forms of Life, STPI, Singapore. He will next show at Kingsgate Project Space (2023) and Mamoth Contemporary (2024) in London. As a writer, he has contributed to kultureflash.net, The Brooklyn Rail and various British magazines, as well as ocula.com, artcritical.com and Artforum.